*Anyone else seeing a certain cognitive dissonance here?
*Strange times.
http://bryce.vc/post/2938771491/the-video-above-is-less-than-a-minute-long-please
The video above is less than a minute long. Please take a moment to watch
 it.
I’ll wait.
Did you see it? Sure there is much to the revolution unfolding in Egypt, but
 that’s not the revolution I’m highlighting here.
In the video you’ll notice the events of the day are not getting
 captured by film crews and news reporters. They’re being documented by people with
 their mobile phones. Take another look at the video and count the number of
 illuminated mobile phone screens you see being raised overhead to capture
 pictures and video as the scenes in the streets unfolds.
I’m as guilty as anyone else for being overly enthused with investment
 opportunities as the world goes increasingly more mobile. But, in the case
 above, we’re not talking about some Stanford dropouts who’ve developed
 a hot new iPhone app. We’re seeing something much more fundamental. Not just a
 shift from the PC to handsets, but a shift from disconnected and isolated
 members of developing nations to connected global citizens. Many of whom
 skipped the PC altogether.
I had a conversation last week, that’s still rattling around in my head,
 which was both troubling and inspiring. In it my friend pointed out that
 people in the developing world have mobile phones before they have clean
 water or toilets. Indeed, India has over 500 million mobile subscribers
 while less than 400 million Indians have access to toilets.
By their nature, these phones were born social. They were built from the
 ground up to connect us. First with voice, then with text. Now, they’re
 packed capabilities like photos, videos and a wave of native and web
 applications. We’re just beginning to catch a glimpse of what a powerful
 and disruptive force they can be. Not just to incubent handset manufactures and
 telcos but to social movements and government regimes.
I’ve made clear my belief that we’re in the midst of a massive global
 reinvention. Not just a shift from analog to digital, but a shift from
 centralized control to distributed systems. From isolated single user
 experiences to a global social fabric. These mobile devices are the of
 Gutenberg presses of our generation. This is not a bubble, this is a
 revolution.
 –
 FN +91-9822122436 P +91-832-2409490
original at:
 http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/217747/internet_providers_are_t...
ISPs Are the New Secret Police, Says Report
 By Jennifer Baker, IDG News
More and more European Union member states are delegating online
 policing to private companies and Internet service providers,
 according to a report released Wednesday.
Where law enforcement agencies would traditionally have tackled the
 problem of illegal online content, more powers are being given to ISPs
 in the name of industry self-regulation, according to a study by the
 organization European Digital Rights (EDRI). That trend is likely to
 become stronger with increasing “extra-judicial sanctions” against
 consumers, EDRI said.
Proposed legislation and “non-binding guidelines” have left
 intermediaries in a precarious position, unsure whether they are
 liable for the actions of consumers over their networks. So-called
 “three strikes” laws, under which alleged copyright infringers receive
 three warnings before their Internet connection is cut off, put the
 onus on Internet service providers to police customers. Such laws
 currently appear in some form in French, Irish and U.K. legislation,
 where they have met with anger from ISPs. In France, the law can
 impose a fine and a one-year Internet connection suspension. The
 U.K.’s Digital Economy Act, adopted last year, provoked concern from
 the country’s two largest ISPs, BT and TalkTalk.
International trade agreements such as the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade
 Agreement (ACTA), and bilateral trade agreements the E.U. has signed
 with India and South Korea, all leave the door open for intermediary
 liability.
“The European Commission appears far from perturbed by the dangers
 for fundamental rights of this approach and appears keen to export
 the approach. This process is gradually strangling the openness that
 is at the core of the Internet. This openness has enhanced democracy,
 has shaken dictatorships and has boosted economies worldwide. This
 openness is what we will lose through privatized policing of the
 Internet by private companies,” said Joe McNamee, Advocacy Coordinator
 at European Digital Rights.
Where is the contradiction? One article describes the potential of the Internet, the other shows the dangers to this potential.
ReplyDelete