From the outside in

Saturday, July 30, 2011

Michael Yarbrough: Behind the Scenes: European Space Operations Centre

via Technology on HuffingtonPost.com by Michael Yarbrough on 7/29/11

With the recent end of NASA's manned space shuttle program, millions of interested fans have been left at the proverbial altar wondering, "What's next?" and -- while no single country or agency can wholly respond to this question -- some answers can be found at the European Space Operations Centre (ESOC) in Darmstadt, Germany.

Part of the larger European Space Agency (ESA), the ESOC is undertaking some of the most compelling and contemporary research in the world and is charged with the mission control of all European non-manned missions to space. I was recently granted a behind-the-scenes look at the ESA's German-based command center and was able to speak to four of the scientists and engineers behind these spectacular advances.

Mars Express with Engineer Thomas Ormston
Mars Express (MEX) was launched in mid-2003 and, while one of its main components - the Beagle 2 Mars lander - failed, MEX has yielded some never-before-seen data and images, providing a priceless amount of insight into the past, present and potential future of Mars. For instance, MEX was the first spacecraft to detect methane in Mars' atmosphere and was also the first in discovering Martian sub-surface water, both raising provocative questions regarding the potential for life on the Red Planet. In addition, MEX's mounted VMC camera is the only camera to capture a full-orbit video of any planet other than Earth. As an added bonus, MEX's polar orbit occasionally intersects with Phobos' - one of Mars' two moons - equatorial orbit, providing some insight into the mysterious moon that appears to defy all logic as to its origin in our solar system.

Rosetta Mission with SOM (Spacecraft Operations Manager) Andrea Accomazzo
Seven years into a ten year mission, ESA and ESOC have committed a vast amount of time and effort to Rosetta, a mission whose goal is entirely novel to autonomous space exploration. Recently placed in hibernation, Rosetta is currently the farthest reaching solar-powered spacecraft in history. As of now, Rosetta is orbiting at a distance of 679.7 million kilometers from Earth and will reach its peak distance in December 2012 at 937.1 million kilometers from Earth. Distance is not the name of the game for Rosetta, though, and the scientists and engineers of ESOC will be operating at much higher stakes upon awakening the long-distance spacecraft. ESOC and Rosetta engineers plans to orbit and land on a comet, something that no space agency has ever successfully attempted.

Space Debris with Prof. Dr. Heiner Klinkrad
The problem of space debris (SD) may initially seem trivial but, in reality, orbiting debris is both a major financial liability and a matter of life and death to the mission astronauts themselves. SD will typically impact man-made objects in space at a speed of about 10 kilometers per second. To put this in perspective, machine gun bullets typically are fired at a speed of 800 meters per second. When ESOC scientist Dr. Heiner Klinkrad test-fired a one-centimeter projectile at a "mere" 8 kilometers per second into a solid aluminum block, the results were catastrophic. In particular, notice that - while the projectile didn't fully penetrate the aluminum - the shockwaves it sent fractured the side opposite of impact. If this happened on the ISS, this fracturing would have peppered astronauts with deadly shrapnel. With that in mind, learning how to both mitigate the accumulation of SD and begin planning remediation processes - while navigating the various international political issues that come with removing satellites from orbit - is crucial to the future of our orbital presence around Earth, both manned and autonomous.

ERS-2 De-Orbiting with SOM Dr. Frank Diekmann
When it comes to space programs, a satellite's blast into the cosmos almost certainly overshadows its return journey. Don't tell that to Dr. Diekmann and the control crew of ERS-2, an aging satellite that recently completed its scientific mission and is now being stepped through the Earth's atmosphere in a procedure that, once again, has never been attempted at ESOC. Being an older spacecraft, ERS-2 features a host of technical issues - common to vessels that have endured an extended tour in the rigors of space - and malfunctions have spread to a variety of positioning instruments, making the controlled descent of ERS-2 all the more difficult. Working virtually seven days per week, though, the ERS-2 crew is carefully navigating the lower reaches of orbit at a relatively cozy 690 kilometers above Earth. De-orbiting is not a quick process, though, and while the work of the ERS-2 crew is currently scheduled to end in September 2011, the satellite will continue its slow and steady descent for an additional 10-14 years, eventually vaporizing in Earth's atmosphere.

Posted via email from The New Word Order

House panel approves broadened ISP snooping bill

via The Liberty Voice by Jason Rink on 7/29/11

Internet providers would be forced to keep logs of their customers’ activities for one year–in case police want to review them in the future–under legislation that a U.S. House of Representatives committee approved today. The 19 to 10 vote represents a victory for conservative Republicans, who made data retention their first...

Thanks for subscribing!

Posted via email from The New Word Order

Friday, July 29, 2011

SpaceX Plans To Reach Space Station Later This Year

via Technology on HuffingtonPost.com by Bianca Bosker on 7/29/11


By Irene Klotz
CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida | Thu Jul 28, 2011 6:20pm EDT
(Reuters) - Space Exploration Technologies, a privately owned firm developing a space taxi with U.S.-government backing, plans to launch its second test capsule on November 30 and send it all the way to the International Space Station, a company manager said on Thursday.

The Hawthorne, California-based company is also known as SpaceX. It leveraged $300 million of NASA funds with $500 million from investors, including founder and chief executive Elon Musk, to develop the Falcon family of rockets, multipurpose Dragon capsules, manufacturing and test sites, and launch facilities in Florida and at Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands.

SpaceX currently is working on upgrading the Dragon cargo capsule for human occupants and has broken ground on a third launch site at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California for a heavy-lift version of the Falcon rocket.

"We see both cargo and crew (flight) services as being the key to opening up not only NASA's full use of the great International Space Station but also to open up other uses of low-Earth orbit, some we are talking about and some we have yet to even envision," Dennis Stone, a program manager with NASA's Commercial Crew and Cargo office at the Johnson Space Center in Houston, said at a commercial space conference on Thursday.

The space station, a $100 billion project of the United States, Russia, Europe, Japan and Canada, is a complex of laboratories and platforms built to take advantage of the unique environment of microgravity for research and to test new technologies.

It was assembled 220 miles above Earth over the past 11 years, primarily with the now-retired U.S. space shuttle fleet.

SpaceX, which in December became the first private company to put a capsule into orbit and bring it back to Earth, is one of two firms NASA has hired to fly cargo to the space station in the post-shuttle era.

The second firm, Orbital Sciences Corp., of Dulles, Virginia, plans to debut its Cygnus capsule next year.

SpaceX intends to combine its second and third test flights with a single mission, scheduled to launch November 30 from Cape Canaveral, Florida, Garrett Reisman, a former astronaut now working with SpaceX, said at the NewSpace 2011 conference that was held at NASA's Ames Research Center in California and broadcast on the Internet.

"The next flight of the Dragon we're going to go all the way and berth it to the space station, drop cargo off and bring stuff back," Reisman said.

That would position SpaceX to begin work on its 12-flight, $1.6 billion station cargo delivery mission.

SpaceX also is among four companies holding a combined $269 million in NASA contracts to develop space taxis that can fly astronauts to the space station, a job now handled by Russia at a cost of more than $50 million per person.

NASA's other partners are Boeing Co, privately owned Sierra Nevada Corp., and Blue Origin, a start-up owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.

(Editing by Jane Sutton)
Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

Posted via email from The New Word Order

xkcd: Lanes

GOP launches net neutrality probe

via POLITICO Top Stories by Brooks Boliek on 7/28/11

House Republicans say they suspect the recent FCC order was orchestrated by liberal interests.

Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Email this Article Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon

Posted via email from The New Word Order

US ISP/copyright deal: a one-sided private law for corporations, without pub...

via Boing Boing by Cory Doctorow on 7/28/11

Last month, the major American ISPs and entertainment industry lobbyists struck a deal to limit Internet access for alleged copyright infringers. This deal, negotiated in secret with the help of New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo did not include any public interest groups or comment from the public. As a result, it’s as one-sided and stilted as you’d imagine. Corynne McSherry from the Electronic Frontier Foundation analyzes the material that these cozy corporate negotiators left out, the stuff that public interest groups would have demanded. Here’s an abbreviated list:

The burden should be on the content owners to establish infringement, not on the subscribers to disprove infringement. The Internet access providers will treat the content owners’ notices of infringement as presumptively accurate–obligating subscribers to defend against the accusations, and in several places requiring subscribers to produce evidence “credibly demonstrating” their innocence. This burden-shift violates our traditional procedural due process norms and is based on the presumed reliability of infringement-detection systems that subscribers haven’t vetted and to which they cannot object. (The content owners’ systems will be reviewed by “impartial technical experts,” but the experts’ work will be confidential). Without subscribers being able to satisfy themselves that the notification systems are so reliable that they warrant a burden-shift, content owners should have to prove the merits of their complaints before internet access providers take any punitive action against subscribers.

Subscribers should be able to assert the full range of defenses to copyright infringement. A subscriber who protests an infringement notice may assert only six pre-defined defenses, even though there are many other possible defenses available in a copyright litigation. And even the six enumerated defenses are incomplete. For example, the “public domain” defense applies only if the work was created before 1923–even though works created after 1923 can enter the public domain in a variety of ways.

Content owners should be accountable if they submit incorrect infringement notices. A subscriber who successfully challenges an infringement notice gets a refund of the $35 review fee, but the MOU doesn’t spell out any adverse consequences for the content owner that make the mistake – or even making repeated mistakes. Content owners should be on the hook if they overclaim copyright infringement.

Subscribers should have adequate time to prepare a defense. The MOU gives subscribers only 10 business days to challenge a notice or their challenge rights are waived (a subscriber might get an extra 10 business days “for substantial good cause”). This period isn’t enough time for most subscribers to research and write a proper defense. Subscribers should get adequate time to defend themselves.

There should be adequate assurances that the reviewers are neutral. The MOU requires that reviewers must be lawyers and specifies that the CCI will train the reviews in “prevailing legal principles” of copyright law – an odd standard given the complexity of, and jurisdictional differences in, copyright law. We’re especially interested in the identity of these lawyers, and why they are willing to review cases for less than $35 each (assuming the CCI keeps some of the $35 review fee for itself). Perhaps there will be a ready supply of lawyer-reviewers who are truly independent. Given the low financial incentives, another possibility is that the reviewers will be lawyers tied—financially or ideologically—to the content owner community. To ensure that the reviewers remain truly neutral, reviewer resumes should be made public, and checks-and-balances should be built into the reviewer selection process to ensure that the deck isn’t stacked against subscribers from day 1.

This is American corporate private law, a topsy-turvy world where the burden of proof is on the accused, where companies get to tear inconvenient laws out of the statute book, and where the judges are trained by the plaintiffs and instructed in which parts of the law to pay attention to.

The “Graduated Response” Deal: What if Users Had Been At the Table?

(via Command Line)

Posted via email from The New Word Order

Thursday, July 28, 2011

AT & T merger gets static

via POLITICO Top Stories by Michelle Quinn on 7/27/11

Democratic support for the T-Mobile deal appears to be slipping.

Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Email this Article Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon

Posted via email from The New Word Order

First Asteroid Companion of Earth Discovered at Last


The first in a long-sought type of asteroid companion to Earth has now been discovered, a space rock that always dances in front of the planet along its orbital path, just beyond its reach.

The asteroid, called 2010 TK7, is nearly 1,000 feet (300 meters) across and currently leading the Earth by about 50 million miles (80 million kilometers).

[More]

Add to digg Add to StumbleUpon Add to Reddit Add to Facebook Add to del.icio.us Email this Article

Posted via email from The New Word Order

#MO High School Bans ‘SlaughterHouse Five’ From Curriculum, Library #fail

via ThinkProgress by Tanya Somanader on 7/27/11

On Monday at the Republic, MO school board meeting, four Republic School Board members reviewed a year-old complaint that three books are inappropriate reading material for high school children. In a 4-0 vote, the members decided to ax two of the three books from the high school curriculum and the library shelves: Twenty Boy Summer by Sarah Ockler and Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut. Speak by Laurie Halse Anderson was sparred. The resident who filed the original complaint targeted these three books because “they teach principles contrary to the Bible“:

Wesley Scroggins, a Republic resident, challenged the use of the books and lesson plans in Republic schools, arguing they teach principles contrary to the Bible.

“I congratulate them for doing what’s right and removing the two books,” said Scroggins, who didn’t attend the board meeting. “It’s unfortunate they chose to keep the other book.”

Speak is an award-winning novel that describes a high school date rape victim’s personal struggles. This novel was approved because, as school superintendent Vern Minor said, only one page is used to “tastefully, not graphically” describe the rape and there were only three instances of profanity. But Twenty Boy Summer, a book about a young girl who struggles with loving another after her boyfriend suddenly dies, apparently focused too much on “sensationalizing sexual promiscuity” and featured “questionable language, drunkenness, lying to parents and a lack of remorse.” “If the book had ended on a different note, I might have though differently,” said Minor.

As for the modern classic Slaughterhouse Five, the book is no stranger to censorship. One of the first literary acknowledgments that homosexual men, or “fairies” in the novel, were victims in the Holocaust, school classrooms and libraries frequently ban the book for its use of profanity and depictions of sex. The Supreme Court actually considered the First Amendment implications of the removal of this book, among others, from libraries in the 1982 case Island Tree School District v. Pico. The Court’s plurality concluded that “local school boards may not remove books from school library shelves simply because they dislike the ideas contained in those books and seek by their removal to ‘prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion.’” Minor’s reason for removing the novel? “The language is just really, really intense…I don’t think it has any place in high school…I’m not saying it’s a bad book.”

While the books will be removed from the curriculum and the library, students desiring to read these books can get parent permission to use them for a school project. “If the parent thinks ‘For Johnny, it is age-appropriate,’ then we’ll let the parent make the call,” Minor said. It is important to note that, out of the four School Board Members, only one has actually read all three books.

Posted via email from The New Word Order

DOS Turns 30

via TechCrunch by Devin Coldewey on 7/27/11

C:\>_

Look familiar? Then you must be old enough to have used DOS, perhaps the best-known command-line-based OS in popular computing history. I’m proud to have done so myself, though a few years later and I would likely have missed out altogether.

The history of the OS is well-documented around the web, and perusing it is a nice reminder of the way things used to be. It came into its own in the early mid eighties (after being bought by Microsoft in 1981), mirroring the rise of the personal PC. Though the many developers that read this blog likely have a more varied personal OS history, DOS is something we can probably all look back on semi-fondly. I have fond memories of booting our 486 into 3.1 and immediately navigating to the \games directory to launch Commander Keen for some 16-color alien-blasting.

The legacy of DOS is still present today. DOS-compatible computing is the reason system drives start at C (A and B were floppies), and why many of our file extensions are the way they are. And I still feel the effects of DOS’s 8-character limita~1 today.

You can see the step-by-step improvement of the OS (by several companies, more like Linux-compatibles today than anything else) at this Wikipedia page, and a more succinct history can be found here.

If you feel like taking the old OS for a spin, try booting up FreeDOS and see if you still have your old directory navigation skills. Or if you just want to escape into the games of yesteryear, pick up DOSBox (and a frontend) and head over to Classic DOS Games or Abandonia.

Got a favorite DOS memory? Feel free to share it below. And join me in enthusiastically wishing DOS a happy 30th birthday.


Posted via email from The New Word Order