From the outside in

Thursday, March 31, 2011

VIDEO: Indiana GOP Rep Says Women Will Pretend To Be Raped To Get Free Abort...

via ThinkProgress by Tanya Somanader on 3/30/11

Yesterday morning, the Indiana House considered an anti-abortion bill that “would put some of the tightest abortion restrictions in the nation into Indiana law.” Introduced by state Rep. Eric Turner (R), HB 1210 would make most abortions illegal after 20 weeks. Current law restricts abortions after the fetus is viable, generally around 24 weeks.

In an attempt to soften the blow this bill would land on Hoosier women, state Rep. Gail Riecken (D) introduced an amendment to exempt “women who became pregnant due to rape or incest, or women for whom pregnancy threatens their life or could cause serious and irreversible physical harm” from being forced to carry to term. Fearing this bill would “push women to the back alleys” for illegal abortions, Riecken pleaded with lawmakers to allow women to make the choice in these cases.

Turner then stepped to the podium and insisted that Riecken’s amendment would create a “giant loophole” for women. That loophole? Women “could simply say they’ve been raped”:

TURNER: With all do respect to Rep. Riecken, I understand what she’s trying to do. But as you know that when the federal health care bill was going through Congress there was a lot of discussion whether this would allow for abortion coverage and of course we were all told it would not. And the bill, my house bill 1210, would prevent that for any insurance company to provide abortion coverage under federal health care bill. This [amendment] would open that window and I would ask you to oppose this amendment.

I just want you to think about this, in my view, giant loophole that could be created where someone who could — now i want to be careful, I don’t want to disparage in any way someone who has gone through the experience of a rape or incest — but someone who is desirous of an abortion could simply say that they’ve been raped or there’s incest.

Watch it:

Outraged by Turner’s allegation, state Rep. Linda Lawson (D) — who spent six years as a sex crimes investigator for the Indiana police — delivered an emotional rebuke. Describing her experience with both elderly and young children who had been raped, she forcefully informed Turner that “they don’t make it up.” “Women don’t make this up! My Goodness!” she exclaimed. “This is the state of Indiana!”

The House voted down Riecken’s amendment 42 to 54. The bill “now is eligible for a final vote in the House later this week. It then would move to the Senate, which earlier passed similar legislation aimed at abortion.”

Posted via email from The New Word Order

Augmented Reality: Valpak and Junaio

via Beyond The Beyond by Bruce Sterling on 3/29/11

*Group coupons, or, Augmented Depression Reality.

Posted via email from The New Word Order

The History Of Internet Usage And Speeds (Infographic)

via TechCrunch by Robin Wauters on 3/30/11

Not a fan of infographics? Be gone!

For I felt compelled to share with you this infographic made by the folks over at Webhostingbuzz, visually showing how fast the Internet has made its way to the people of this world in the past 15 years – and how fast the Internet has become in some parts of it.

Here’s what stood out for me: the United States leads the world in broadband penetration, with Americans consuming way more gigabytes per month than Europeans or people in Japan and South Korea.

The United States only ranks 30th when it comes to downloads speeds, however, thus trailing countries like South Korea, Latvia, Andorra and the Republic of Moldova. Surprisingly, downloads speeds in the US still surpass those in the UK, Canada, Australia and Israel.

From Horseback To Bullet Train: The History Of Internet Usage And Speeds


Posted via email from The New Word Order

Canadian ISPs admit that their pricing is structured to discourage Internet use

via Boing Boing by Cory Doctorow on 3/29/11

Canada's cable-based ISPs have filed regulatory comments on their "Usage-Based Billing" model that caps bandwidth use and then charges high rates for overage. In these comments, they admit that the rates they charge have nothing to do with what it costs them to provide their service, and are instead aimed at punishing their customers for "overusing" the Internet. In other words, they've set out to limit the growth of networked based business and new kinds of services, and to prevent Canadians experimentation that enables them to use the Internet to its fullest.
In order to be effective as an economic ITMP, the usage based price component needs to be established so as to discourage use above the set limit. The price should incent use in excess of the limit only to the extent that the consumer would gain significant value from that usage. If the price is set substantially below the consumer's value, it will have little influence on usage. It follows that the price does not necessarily reflect the cost of supplying the network capacity.

[Michael Geist's commentary:] In other words, UBB is behaviour based billing, not usage based billing. Notwithstanding the claims about fairness, paying what you use, or costs to the network, overage pricing is not connected to cost or even value - it is designed to price above the real value to stop Canadians from "overusing" the Internet.

Cable Companies on UBB: No Link Between Cost and Price

(Image: Girlfriend's aunt network diagram, a Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (2.0) image from pitel's photostream)

Posted via email from The New Word Order

Big cable-backed broadband bill soars through NC House, one step closer to s...

via Engadget by Darren Murph on 3/30/11

We've said it before, and we'll say it again: Time Warner Cable is made up of some insanely shady folks. And frankly, it's not just TWC to blame here -- CenturyLink, Embarq and a smattering of other big telecom companies are banding together in order to push the ironically-named H129 "Level Playing Field" bill straight into law. Unfortunately, said bill sailed through the clearly oblivious (or "persuaded") North Carolina House this week, with just 37 sane individuals voting against 81 delusional proponents. For those outside of the loop, the bill effectively suggests that commercial entities -- municipal ISPs like Wilson's own Greenlight that provide greater levels of service with lower costs -- are unfairly competing against for-profit monoliths. In short, that's an absolute joke. Rep. Bill Faison nailed it with this quote:
"This bill will make it practically impossible for cities to provide a fundamental service. Where's the bill to govern Time Warner? Let's be clear about whose bill this is. This is Time Warner's bill. You need to know who you're doing this for."
Yours truly just so happens to reside in the wonderful state of North Carolina, and knows first-hand what it's like to live in a major metropolitan area with a single high-speed broadband carrier. TWC has only recently announced impending DOCSIS 3.0 coverage, but early installations in the heart of Raleigh have been fraught with latency issues and router difficulties. Oh, and it's charging $99 per month for a service with 5Mbps up; for comparison's sake, Greenlight gives customers 10Mbps internet (in both directions), home phone and expanded basic cable for the exact same fare. So, NC lawmakers -- how exactly do your constituents gain access to that "level playing field?"

[Image courtesy of IndyWeek]

Big cable-backed broadband bill soars through NC House, one step closer to stifling ISP competition originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:24:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink ArsTechnica  |  sourceWRAL  | Email this | Comments

Posted via email from The New Word Order

Thursday morning spectacular




- Posted using Mobypicture.com

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Amazon on Cloud Player: we don't need no stinkin' licenses

via Ars Technica by jacqui@arstechnica.com (Jacqui Cheng) on 3/29/11

"Cloud Player is an application that lets customers manage and play their own music. It's like any number of existing media management applications. We do not need a license to make Cloud Player available."

That's Amazon spokesperson Cat Griffin's response to questions over whether the company's new music storage and playback services require licenses from the record companies to operate. Amazon seems to insist that since users are uploading and playing back their own music, the original download licenses still apply and no new licenses are necessary—a seemingly logical conclusion that the record industry disagrees with.

Read the rest of this article...

Read the comments on this post

Posted via email from The New Word Order

Augmented Reality: Magic Vision Lab AR Weather System

via Beyond The Beyond by Bruce Sterling on 3/29/11

*It’s headmounted laboratory weirdness, but it’s cute. via @AugmentedManc

Posted via email from The New Word Order

Data caps claim a victim: Netflix cuts streaming video quality

via Ars Technica by nate@arstechnica.com (Nate Anderson) on 3/29/11

Netflix announced last night that Canadian users will, by default, receive lower-quality—and lower-bandwidth—streaming video. The change was made to protect users, "because many Canadian Internet service providers unfortunately enforce monthly caps on the total amount of data consumed."

Fast Internet connections could previously chew through 30-70GB of data while streaming 30 hours of Netflix video in a month. Data caps for the Rogers cable operator and for Bell Canada start at 2GB per month; cable operator Shaw starts at 15GB.

Read the rest of this article...

Read the comments on this post

Posted via email from The New Word Order

New Words Needed v #Dilbertblog

via Dilbert.com Blog on 3/28/11

There's no derogatory label for people who label others. This creates an imbalance in the linguistic arsenal. Example:

    Person 1: "If you don't watch sports, you're a racist."

    Person 2: "Oh yeah? Well, you're...a...person who assigns labels that are not sensible!"

See what I mean? It's like being in a stick fight and not having a stick. But we can fix that by concocting a...wait for it...label for labelers. I suggest that such a person be called a labelass. Example:

Person 1: "If you don't watch sports, you're a racist."

Person 2: "You're a labelass."

Person 1: "What just happened here?"

It will take some work to make labelass a real word and imbue it with the king-of-kings argumentative superpower it needs. Let's start that journey by giving it a proper definition.

                Labelass: A special kind of idiot who uses labels as a substitute for comprehension.

We also need a name for people who believes that everyone who has a different point of view has the same opinion as everyone else who also has a different point of view. Example:

Person 1: "I don't think we should bomb Elbonia just because someone said they have a giant slingshot."

Person 2: "Typical liberal."

Let's call a person who believes there are only two viewpoints for every topic a binarian. And don't worry that using the word will make you a labelass. A labelass is one who uses a label as a substitute for comprehension. If someone is indeed being a total binarian, the label fits.

                Binarian: A special kind of idiot who believes that all people who hold a different view
                                  from oneself have the same views as each other.

And we need a new word for people who misunderstand another person's point of view and proceed to debate that misunderstanding as if it were the real point of view. I think we should call that person a masturdebator.

                 Masturdebator: One who takes pleasure in furiously debating viewpoints that only
                                                exist in the imagination.

Example:

Person 1: "It's clear from your statement about this year's corn crop that you deny the Holocaust."

Person 2: "What do you do with the other hand, masturdebator?"

Posted via email from The New Word Order

Monday, March 28, 2011

Pretend White Supremacist Drill Canceled Due to Real White Supremacist Threa...

via Gawker by Max Read on 3/28/11

Pottawattamie County, Iowa wanted to hold an anti-terrorism drill. They spent four months planning it around a scenario wherein anti-immigration white supremacists shoot up a school. And then they had to cancel it, because real white supremacists started making threats. More »

Posted via email from The New Word Order

Augmented Reality: AR cartoon on cereal box

via Beyond The Beyond by Bruce Sterling on 3/28/11

*It’s probably not the first AR cartoon on a cereal box, but there’s something great about this ancient kid-culture schtick — cereal plus cartoons — fusing into a single medium.

*Especially great that it’s done by a French tech outfit better known for designing fighter aircraft.

*If you’re wondering about the punchy soundtrack, this Brazilian-inspired feature has Sergio Mendes and Bebel Gilberto voicing cartoon bit-parts.

Posted via email from The New Word Order

2/3rds of US Corporations Pay Zero Federal Taxes: US Uncut Movement Builds t...

via AlterNet by Allison Kilkenny, The Nation on 3/27/11

From coast-to-coast, more than forty cities joined in a day of action protesting the tax-dodging of massive corporations that they see as the real source of the country's deficit.

Posted via email from The New Word Order